Gemma · Dense · Gemma

Can I run Gemma 2 27B locally?

Still a strong writer, but the 8K context and lack of vision make Gemma 3 27B the better pick today.

Parameters
27.2B
VRAM at Q4
20 GB
Max context
8K
Released
2024-06

Memory needed by quantisation

Total includes weights, an 8K-token KV cache and runtime overhead. Lower quants trade quality for size.

QuantBits/weightWeightsTotal neededQuality
FP16 16 51 GB 56 GB Full precision. Reference quality, 2× the size of 8-bit.
Q8_0 8.5 27 GB 32 GB Effectively lossless. The safe choice when it fits.
Q6_K 6.56 21 GB 25 GB Near-lossless; quality loss is hard to measure.
Q5_K_M 5.67 18 GB 22 GB Very good. A common sweet spot above Q4.
Q4_K_M 4.83 15 GB 20 GB The default. Best size/quality trade-off for local use.
Q3_K_M 3.91 12 GB 17 GB Noticeable degradation; useful to squeeze a size up.
Q2_K 3.35 11 GB 15 GB Aggressive. Quality drops a lot — last resort to fit.

Which hardware runs Gemma 2 27B?

Best quantisation that fits each device at 8K context, with a rough speed estimate. Try your exact setup →

HardwareMemoryFitBest quantSpeed
RTX 3090 24 GB Runs well Q5 ~35 tok/s
Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24 GB Runs well Q5 ~36 tok/s
RTX 4090 24 GB Runs well Q5 ~38 tok/s
RTX 5090 32 GB Runs well Q6 ~58 tok/s
RTX A6000 48 GB Runs well Q8 ~19 tok/s
RTX 6000 Ada 48 GB Runs well Q8 ~24 tok/s
A100 80 GB 80 GB Runs well FP16 ~27 tok/s
H100 80 GB 80 GB Runs well FP16 ~44 tok/s
Mac · M4 Pro, 48 GB 48 GB Runs well Q8 ~6.8 tok/s
Mac · M1/M2/M3 Max, 32 GB 32 GB Runs well Q5 ~15 tok/s
Mac · M4 Max, 64 GB 64 GB Runs well Q8 ~14 tok/s
Mac · M1/M2/M3 Max, 64 GB 64 GB Runs well Q8 ~10.0 tok/s
Mac · M3/M4 Max, 128 GB 128 GB Runs well FP16 ~7.2 tok/s
Mac Studio · M1/M2 Ultra, 128 GB 128 GB Runs well FP16 ~11 tok/s
Mac Studio · M3 Ultra, 256 GB 256 GB Runs well FP16 ~11 tok/s
Mac Studio · M3 Ultra, 512 GB 512 GB Runs well FP16 ~11 tok/s
CPU only · 32 GB RAM 32 GB Runs well Q6 ~2.3 tok/s
CPU only · 64 GB RAM 64 GB Runs well FP16 ~1.1 tok/s
CPU only · 128 GB RAM 128 GB Runs well FP16 ~1.2 tok/s
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 16 GB Runs (tight) Q2 ~18 tok/s
Radeon RX 7900 XT 20 GB Runs (tight) Q3 ~43 tok/s
RTX 5070 Ti 16 GB Runs (tight) Q2 ~57 tok/s
RTX 4070 Ti Super 16 GB Runs (tight) Q2 ~42 tok/s
RTX 5080 16 GB Runs (tight) Q2 ~61 tok/s
RTX 4080 Super 16 GB Runs (tight) Q2 ~47 tok/s
Mac · M4 (base), 24 GB 24 GB Runs (tight) Q3 ~6.5 tok/s
RTX 3060 12 GB 12 GB Won't fit — —
RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8 GB Won't fit — —
RTX 3080 10 GB 10 GB Won't fit — —
RTX 5070 12 GB Won't fit — —
RTX 4070 Super 12 GB Won't fit — —
Mac · M1/M2/M3 (base), 8 GB 8 GB Won't fit — —
Mac · M1/M2/M3 (base), 16 GB 16 GB Won't fit — —
CPU only · 8 GB RAM 8 GB Won't fit — —
CPU only · 16 GB RAM 16 GB Won't fit — —

GPUs that run Gemma 2 27B well

The most affordable cards in our list that run it at a good quantisation.

Hardware links are affiliate links — they don't change the recommendation.

What Gemma 2 27B is good for

Related models

FAQ

How much VRAM does Gemma 2 27B need?

At Q4_K_M, Gemma 2 27B needs about 20 GB including a 8K-token context and overhead (15 GB for the weights alone). Higher quantisation needs more; see the table for every level.

What is the cheapest way to run Gemma 2 27B?

The smallest device that runs it well in our list is the RTX 4090 (24 GB). Anything with at least that much memory should handle it at a usable quantisation.

Is Gemma 2 27B good for general chat & assistance?

Still a strong writer, but the 8K context and lack of vision make Gemma 3 27B the better pick today.

Estimates — see how we compute these. Memory figures assume an 8K context; long-context use needs more.